Fulltext Search
Death of the Bob Richards Rule?Supreme Court Limits Federal Common Law ( Rodrigues v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.)

When can a Federal Court employ a federal common law rule to make its decision in the case? Justice Gorsuch answer this in Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., U.S., No. 18-1269, 2/25/20.[1] The answer . . . less often than you might think.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, BCLP, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Office of Thrift Supervision, Internal Revenue Code (USA)
To Retain (Under Section 327(a) or 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code) or Not to Retain? Retention of Liquidation Consultants in Bankruptcy Cases

In a recent opinion – In re Heritage Home Group LLC, et al., Case No. 18-11736 (KG), 2018 WL 4684802 (Bankr. D. Del. Sept. 27, 2018) – the Delaware Bankruptcy Court addressed the longstanding issue of which professional persons must be retained under section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Liquidation, US District Court for District of Delaware
Absolute(ly) No - A Reminder That When It Comes to Reorganization, Equity Comes Last

A fundamental tenet of chapter 11 bankruptcies is the absolute priority rule. Initially a judge-created doctrine, the absolute priority rule was partially codified in section 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code. Under section 1129, plans must be “fair and equitable” in order to be confirmed.

USA, North Carolina, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor
Fees, Fees, Fees: SDNY Bankruptcy Court Questions the Ongoing Validity of the “Blackstone Protocol” for Investment Banker Fees in Chapter 11 Cases

Background: Professionals’ Fees in Chapter 11 cases

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York