Fulltext Search
Just “Released” by the Third Circuit: In re Millennium Lab Holdings II Key Takeaways

In a highly anticipated decision issued last Thursday (on December 19, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC that a bankruptcy court may constitutionally confirm a chapter 11 plan of reorganization that contains nonconsensual third-party releases. The court considered whether, pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011), Article III of the United States Constitution prohibits a bankruptcy court from granting such releases.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Trustees in Bankruptcy should beware the pitfalls of ignoring legal professional privilege

Shlosberg v Avonwick Holdings Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 1001

Law firm Dechert LLP has been ordered to cease acting for the principal creditor of bankrupt Russian businessman, Mr Shlosberg, because it also acted for the trustees in bankruptcy, and accordingly had had access to documents subject to Mr Shlosberg's legal professional privilege.

Facts

United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, DAC Beachcroft, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Waiver, Discovery, Solicitor, Liquidation, Conspiracy (criminal), Vesting, Legal professional privilege, European Convention on Human Rights, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Trustee, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)