Fulltext Search
Just “Released” by the Third Circuit: In re Millennium Lab Holdings II Key Takeaways

In a highly anticipated decision issued last Thursday (on December 19, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC that a bankruptcy court may constitutionally confirm a chapter 11 plan of reorganization that contains nonconsensual third-party releases. The court considered whether, pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011), Article III of the United States Constitution prohibits a bankruptcy court from granting such releases.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Bankruptcy court (mostly) dismisses complaint against pre-petition lenders based on alleged inequitable conduct

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v Credit Suisse (In re Champion Enterprises, Inc.), 2010 WL 3522132 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Unsecured debt, Breach of contract, Debt, Estoppel, Unjust enrichment, Default (finance), Line of credit, Credit Suisse, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
Right to credit bid upheld under intercreditor agreement

Under section 363(f) of the bankruptcy code, a trustee may sell assets of the bankruptcy estate free and clear of liens and other interests. Generally, absent consent of the lienholder, a trustee may only sell assets free and clear of liens under one of the following conditions:

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Waiver, Option (finance), Debt, Consent, Good faith, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware