Fulltext Search
Moral hazard powers of the Pensions Regulator: how do they apply against a company in insolvency?

Summary

Third parties associated with an employer may find themselves liable to contribute to the employer's occupational pension scheme. Where a pension scheme is in deficit, the Pensions Regulator has powers - so-called 'moral hazard' powers - that can require a third party to give financial support or a specific payment to the pension scheme.

United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, The Pensions Regulator (UK)
Court Approves Key Employee Incentive Plan, Finding it is Not a Disguised Retention Plan

Key Employee Retention Plans (KERPs) and Key Employee Incentive Plans (KEIPs) often are the subject of intense interest, either because a distressed company’s management is focused on developing such programs to retain valuable talent during a time of great uncertainty within its organization or because certain creditor constituencies or parties in interest take issue with the payments a debtor intends to make under the programs.

USA, Colorado, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debtor, Secured creditor
Dueling Debtors: Missouri Bankruptcy Court says Debtor Can Reject Contract that Counterparty (Who is Also a Debtor) Sought to Assume

What happens when the counterparties on both sides of a contract are debtors in separate bankruptcy cases and their estates have contrary views about whether to reject or assume a contract?

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
The Saga Continues: A brief update on the EFIH First Lien Make Whole Litigation

As avid blog readers know, we’ve posted extensively on make whole issues, including several articles covering the ongoing make whole litigations in the chapter 11 cases of Energy Future Holdings and its affiliated debtors, which can be found here, 

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
What the future holds for make-whole claims in bankruptcy (Redux): examining the Energy Future Holdings EFIH second lien make-whole decision

Are you feeling a bit of déjà vu?  We certainly are.  As readers know, here at the Weil Bankruptcy Blog we’ve written extensively about make-wholes.  In two previous posts, What the Future Holds for Make-Whole Claims in Bankruptcy: Examining the Energy Future Holdings EFIH First Lien Make-Whole Decision – 

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy
What education management can teach US about the protections available to minority noteholders in an out-of-court restructuring

Two recent decisions from the District Court for the Southern District of New York have renewed interest in the Trust Indenture Act and the ability of minority bondholders to use it as a shield to protect their rights in an out-of-court nonconsensual restructuring:  Marblegate Asset Management, LLC v.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Unsecured debt
What Marblegate can teach US about the protections available to minority noteholders in an out-of-court restructuring

Two recent decisions from the District Court for the Southern District of New York have renewed interest in the Trust Indenture Act and the ability of minority bondholders to use it as a shield to protect its rights in an out-of-court nonconsensual restructuring:  Marblegate Asset Management, LLC v.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Unsecured debt
What the future holds for make-whole claims in bankruptcy: examining the Energy Future Holdings EFIH first lien make-whole decision – part 2

Today, we follow up on our earlier post where we reviewed the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware’s decision in Energy Future Holdings

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Recast EC Insolvency Regulation now adopted

Summary

We reported in December 2014 that the amendments to the EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceeding (the Recast Regulation) were virtually finalised and agreed between the various legislative organs of the European Union.

Finally after several years, the debate is now over and the European Parliament has now approved the final text – broadly as it was in December 2014. The outcome is good news for cross border corporate restructurings and insolvencies around Europe, but it will not come into force for over two years.

Next steps

European Union, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
What the future holds for make-whole claims in bankruptcy: examining the energy future holdings EFIH first lien make-whole decision – part 1

Two recent decisions from large and highly contested chapter 11 cases add to the developing body of case law on the treatment of make-whole claims in bankruptcy.  First, in a two-part post, we discuss the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware’s decision in Energy Future Holdings, and later, in a follow-up post, we discuss the United States District Court for the Southern District of

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court