On May 4, 2012, Judge J. Paul Oetken of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York held that the Bankruptcy Court has the injunctive power to enforce the automatic stay against entities falling within the Bankruptcy Court’s in personam jurisdiction, and that, in this case, the enforcement of the automatic stay did not violate interests of comity. Sec. Investor Prot. Corp v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec., LLC (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec., LLC), No. 11 Civ. 8629 (JPO), 2012 WL 1570859 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2012).
USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Injunction, Extraterritoriality, Comity, In rem jurisdiction, United States bankruptcy court
Background
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Costs in English law, Abuse of process, Solicitor, Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Honda, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Mediation, Cryptocurrency, Cladding, Non-fungible tokens, Insolvency, American Bankruptcy Institute, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Building Safety Act 2022 (UK)