On Thursday, 4 June 2020, the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (“ODCE”) published a welcome reminder on points to be taken into account when considering liquidators’ reports and the likelihood of restriction proceedings as a consequence of dishonest or irresponsible conduct.

While the ODCE considers each company’s case on its own merits taking into account:

(i) the liquidator’s report on the relevant insolvent entity; and

(ii) any other relevant information obtained independently of the liquidator, broadly speaking:

In our earlier article, we discussed the importance of timing in corporate recovery efforts and the difficulties facing companies with the examinership process and its legislative requirements.

In McFeely v Official Assignee in Bankruptcy [2017] IECA 21, a judgment delivered by Mr. Justice Peart on 2nd February 2017, the Court of Appeal has reiterated the importance of maintaining the integrity of the bankruptcy process in Ireland, and in so doing has provided a useful overview of the law relating to the circumstances in which the Court will order an extension of the bankruptcy period under the Bankruptcy Act 1988 (as amended) (the “Act”).

Background

1.     Overview

Following the enactment of the Personal Insolvency Act, the first steps have been taken to implement the new regime in the Irish insolvency landscape with the making of two Ministerial Orders by the Minister for Justice, Mr. Alan Shatter.

The Orders set 1 March 2013 as the establishment date for the Insolvency Service of Ireland which will operate the new debt resolution arrangements provided for in the Act. The Commencement Orders also enables the Insolvency Service to begin authorising approved intermediaries and personal insolvency practitioners.