The Court of Appeal delivered judgment on Monday morning in the much anticipated appeal in Jervis & Others v Pillar Denton & Others on the treatment of rent payable under a lease held by a corporate tenant that enters administration. The case involved the Game Administration.
Key points
Earlier this week, the English Court of Appeal overturned the recent decisions in Goldacre (Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2009] EWCH 3389 (Ch);2011 Ch 455) and Luminar (Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd v Luminar Lava Ignite [2012] EWCH 951 (Ch)) regarding the treatment of rent in an administration.
21 November 2013
[2013] EWHC 3612 (Comm)
Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division (Hamblen J)
Appointment of a receiver to bring protective claims against shareholder and former directors of a company by a potential creditor under an indemnity
18 December 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 1629
Court of Appeal (Arden, Davis, Floyd LJJ)
Who pays the trustee's costs on an annulment?
The Court of Appeal considered the trustee’s recovery of costs following a successful application by bankrupts, Dr and Mr Oraki, for annulment of bankruptcy orders. The Court approved Redbridge LBC v Mustafa [2010] EWHC (Ch) 1105), identifying four types of costs to be considered when a bankruptcy is annulled:
The Court of Appeal in Pillar Denton Ltd & Others v (1) Jervis (2) Maddison and (3) Game Retail Ltd ([2014] EWCA Civ 180) yesterday overruled previous High Court authority, deciding that rent should be treated as an expense of the administration based on actual usage and not on when the rent falls due. What does this mean for practitioners?
The background
Pillar Denton Ltd & others v Jervis & others [2014] EWCA 180 (“Game Station”)
The outcome of this appeal has been awaited with a high degree of interest. The issue was the extent to which rent should be payable as an expense of an administration or liquidation; if it is payable as an expense, it sits near the top of the priority order for the distribution of the tenant’s assets, and will usually be paid in full. Otherwise, it is among the unsecured debts, and the landlord will have to wait for whatever dividend is ultimately payable.
This week will hopefully see the end of a long running battle between Britain’s biggest landlords and the restructuring profession. On 12 February, the Court of Appeal will start to hear an appeal relating to the administration of Game Station (Jervis v Pillar Denton). It will consider whether the administrators should pay rent for the properties which they occupied during the administration as an administration expense, so ensuring the landlords receive their rent in priority to payments made to other creditors.
Background
On 4 February 2014, our client, Zlomrex International Finance S.A. (“ZIF”), completed the restructuring of its approximately €118 million senior secured high yield notes due 2014 (the “Existing High Yield Bonds”). ZIF, a company incorporated in France, is a financing vehicle for the Cognor group, one of the largest suppliers (by volume) of scrap metal, the second largest seller of semi‑finished steel products and the fifth largest seller (by volume) of finished steel products in Poland.
Last week I blogged about the Capital Gains Tax consequences of undervaluing property. This blog will look at another situation when undervaluing property or shares could lead to future exposure in an insolvency situation.