Judgment by Cregan J of 6 October 2014
Overview
This case concerned an application by the official liquidator of RQB Limited (in liquidation) (the Company) pursuant to S280 of Companies Act 1963 to determine the legal status of a floating charge dated 10 September 2008 which entered into by the Company in favour of Danske Bank (the Bank) and which the liquidator believes to be unenforceable.
Background
The "2005 Facility"
简介
爱尔兰是飞机融资和租赁结构的核心所在地，也是许多国际顶级飞机和发动机出租人的总部所在地。除了极具吸引力的税收政策，高素质和经验丰富的航空专业人才以及作为一个司法管辖区的其他许多优势外，很多中国的租赁公司和航空公司优先考虑选择爱尔兰作为其飞机融资和租赁管辖结构交易架构的司法管辖地是因为在爱尔兰设立公司非常简便且成本经济，并且拥有对债权人友好的法制环境。采用爱尔兰结构有利于吸引低成本融资，并且公司还可以受益于爱尔兰优秀的避免双重征税条约体系。通常，融资和租赁交易使用新成立的爱尔兰公司构建交易结构，这种公司一般称为特殊目的工具（SPV）或特殊目的公司（SPC）。
什么是 SPV？
Ireland is a key location for aircraft financing and leasing structures and is the headquarters for many leading aircraft and engine lessors worldwide.
Insolvency practitioners often encounter difficulties when trying to sell properties in residential developments because an original management company has been struck off the Register of Companies. The standard approach can be laborious and costly. A more cost efficient alternative is often available.
The High Court has confirmed that leave of the Court is required before an application can be brought to cross-examine an Official Assignee (In re Sean Dunne, A Bankrupt [2014] IEHC 113).
Background
In the matter of Shellware Limited (In Liquidation) 2014 IEHC 184
On 1 April 2014 Barrett J. refused an application by the Liquidator of Shellware Limited (In Liquidation) for the restriction of Mr Eoghan Breslin, a former director, under Section 150 of the Companies Act 1990. This decision also helpfully provides clarity regarding applications for an extension of time for the filing of a Report by a Liquidator to the Director of Corporation Enforcement under Section 56 of Company Law Enforcement Act 2001 (“Section 56 Report”).
Congil Construction Limited & Companies Acts: Mannion -v- Connolly & Anor [2013] IEHC 544
On the 28 November 2013 the High Court restricted two directors of an insolvent construction company, Congil Construction Limited, for a period of five years.
The High Court and the Supreme Court recently confirmed a Scheme of Arrangement for SIAC Construction Limited (SCL) and certain related companies despite objections from a number of creditors. The creditors claimed that the exclusion of claims for penalties, interest and, in particular, damages not awarded by a certain date and the imposed waiver of subrogated claims was unfairly prejudicial.
Initial Confirmation Hearing
Flanagan & Anor -v- Crosby & Ors [2014] IEHC59
The Companies (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2013 (the “Act”) was signed into law on 24 December 2013 and has introduced what has become colloquially referred to as “examinership-lite”, or what it is hoped will be a new SME-friendly examinership regime. Examinership is the legal mechanism by which an ailing but potentially viable company can be rescued.
The Act introduces a number of amendments to existing company law legislation, the most significant of which alters the regime in respect of the role of the Circuit Court in the examinership process.