Chapter 15 Resource Articles

In assisting companies doing business with their customers and the supply chain, we have noted that companies increasingly propose to their customers incentives to purchase goods, often in the form of rebates and discounts.

There may be circumstances where setting off the obligation to pay such incentives owed to a customer against the customer’s accounts receivable owed by the customer is necessary to avoid or reduce risk. The need for this “remedy” is exacerbated during periods of financial and market uncertainty.

In a Chapter 15 procedure in Delaware, a disgruntled “creditor” sued the Chapter 15 UK-based “foreign representatives” in their individual capacities. The case is McKillen v. Wallace (In re IBRC), No. 18-1797, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166153 (D. Del. Sept. 27, 2019). Before administrators or liquidators outside the US become concerned about liability for serving as foreign representatives in Chapter 15 cases, read on.

In the Chapter 15 proceedings of Energy Coal S.p.A., the Delaware Bankruptcy Court required a U.S. creditor to recover its claim in Italy.

Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code, which is based on UNCITRAL’s Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, was enacted in 2005 to provide an “effective mechanism” for dealing with cross-border insolvency cases.

Some of Chapter 15’s express objectives are “greater legal certainty for trade and investment” and the “fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies that protects the interests of all creditors and other interested entities, including the debtor.

1. The Momentive Decisions: Cram-Down Interest Rates and Make-Whole Mania 5. Update on the Recognition of the AustralianLiquidation of Octaviar: Satisfying the Debtor Eligibility Requirements in a Chapter 15 Case 6. Speeches, Events and Publications 8. An Introduction to Puerto Rico’s New Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act 10. Q&A: Puerto Rico’s Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act 12. UK Supreme Court Modernizes Agent’s Duty to Account
On August 27, 2014, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) issued a decision enforcing the terms of a Brazilian reorganization plan pursuant to Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In re Rede Energia, S.A., Case No. 14-10078 (SCC) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. August 27, 2014), ECF No. 35 (the “Decision”). Bankruptcy Judge Shelley C. Chapman rejected challenges by a minority group of bondholders who had alleged that the Brazilian Bankruptcy Proceeding was contrary to U.S. public policy.
Cross-Border Bankruptcy Issues (2014 New York City Bankruptcy Conference) - Steven G. Panagos, Lisa J. Donohue, Kathryn A. Coleman, Jay M. Goffman, Hon. Allan L. Gropper, Daniel A. Lowenthal