India’s Parliament passed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026, with the Rajya Sabha approving it Wednesday with a voice vote, News On Air reported. Minister of State for Corporate Affairs Harsh Malhotra moved the Bill, which aims to further amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The Bill also seeks to address procedural delays and interpretational issues among companies and individuals.

Read more

Amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) expand the scrutiny over pre-bankruptcy transactions of distressed companies to cover a longer period, finance and corporate affairs minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Wednesday in Rajya Sabha, livemint.com reported. The upper house of parliament returned the amendment bill that was cleared by Lok Sabha on Monday.

Read more

Vedanta Chairman Anil Agarwal has moved the Supreme Court challenging the approval of Adani Enterprises’ resolution plan for Jaiprakash Associates and following the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s refusal to stay its implementation, IndiaWest reported. The plea, filed on March 25, came after the appellate tribunal declined to halt the ₹14,543 crore plan. The dispute involves assets valued at nearly $4 billion, including power and cement units, residential projects, and the Buddh International Circuit near New Delhi.

Read more

India has proposed an overhaul of its bankruptcy law, including allowing financial creditors ‌to initiate insolvency proceedings and tightening deadlines, in a bid to speed up resolutions and promote ease of doing business, Reuters reported. Resolutions of stressed assets in India have been delayed despite a mandated 330-day timeline under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, introduced ​in 2016, largely due to procedural and legal hurdles. Cases often pile up for admission at ​the National Company Law Tribunal, quasi-judicial body that adjudicates matters related to companies.

Read more

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed appeals filed by the BSE, ruling that insolvency courts have the authority to order the defreezing of Demat accounts of companies undergoing insolvency proceedings, The Economic Times reported. In its order, a two-member bench of the appellate tribunal said that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has clear jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to hear such matters and pass necessary directions.

Read more

Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) spokesperson Manne Krishank on Wednesday accused the Telangana government of awarding ₹2,500 crore in contracts to KLSR Infratech, a company currently under bankruptcy proceedings and investigation, The News Mill reported. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had raided KLSR Infratech in 2018 and designated it a shell company. Speaking to ANI, Krishank stated that NCLAT member Justice Sharad Kumar recused himself from a case involving KLSR Infratech after citing pressure from a senior judge to favor the company.

Read more
The Supreme Court on 15.01.2026, clarified the scope of admission of insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), holding that once the existence of financial debt and default is established, the Adjudicating Authority must admit the application and cannot refuse admission on considerations such as project viability, stage of completion, or the possible impact on homebuyers, The Times of India reported. A Bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R.
Read more
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, has permitted the withdrawal of corporate insolvency resolution proceedings (CIRP) initiated against ATS Heights Private Limited, the developer of the ATS Knightsbridge project, in exercise of its powers under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Hindustan Times reported. The tribunal, through its order dated March 13, allowed an application seeking withdrawal of the insolvency proceedings and dismissed the company's petition as withdrawn.
Read more
A bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram Shirsat, in an order passed on Wednesday, said such strategies by loan defaulters frustrate the very objective of the IBC and paralyse the whole process of lawful steps taken by secured creditors, adding that the court cannot remain a mute spectator when misuse of legal provisions demonstrates failure of justice, the Economic Times of India reported.
Read more