Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Financial Regulatory Developments Focus - Issue 1/10/2018
    2018-01-10

    FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVISORY & FINANCIAL REGULATORY GROUP NEWSLETTER JANUARY 10, 2018 ISSUE 1/2018 Financial Regulatory Developments Focus In this week’s newsletter, we provide a snapshot of the principal U.S., European and global financial regulatory developments of interest to banks, investment firms, broker-dealers, market infrastructure providers, asset managers and corporates. Click here if you wish to access our Financial Regulatory Developments website.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, USA, New York, Banking, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Securitization & Structured Finance, White Collar Crime, A&O Shearman, Federal Reserve Board, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), European Commission, European Banking Authority, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Financial Stability Oversight Council, New York State Department of Financial Services, MiFID
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    A&O Shearman
    Non-consolidation and True Sale Issues for Insurance Company Sponsors — Part Two
    2017-07-31

    Our two-part article on non-con and true sale issues in insurance contexts continues with a deeper dive into the considerations that distinguish these issues from similar remoteness principles in a Bankruptcy Code context. In Part One, we explained some of the basics of state insurance law that bear on these issues and how these can give rise to different approaches in opinion-giving; in this Part Two, we identify some practical obstacles that arise in these kinds of contexts and opinions.

    A Pennsylvania Hypothetical

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York State Insurance Department, New York State Department of Financial Services, New York Court of Appeals
    Authors:
    Daniel A. Rabinowitz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days