Skip to main content
Home
Enter a keyword

Main navigation

Menu
  • US Law
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America
  • Headlines
  • Education Resources
    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Covid 19
    • Conferences and Webinars
    • Newsletters
    • Publications
  • Firm Articles
  • About Us
    • ABI International Board Committee
    • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
  • Join ABI

Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
2015-02-19

Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
2015-01-26

Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

Background

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
2015-02-19

Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
2015-01-26

Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

Background

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
2015-02-19

Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
2015-01-26

Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

Background

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
2015-02-19

Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
2015-01-26

Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

Background

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
2015-02-19

Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article
Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
2015-01-26

Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

Background

Filed under:
United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
Authors:
Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
Location:
United Kingdom
Firm:
Norton Rose Fulbright
View Original Article

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »

Footer menu

  • Publications
  • Newsletters
  • ABI International Board Committee

© 2022 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved