The Court of Appeal has unanimously overturned an unlawful preference ruling from the High Court, finding instead that the repayment of inter-company debt did not amount to a preference because, at the time the operative decision to make the repayment occurred, there was no desire to prefer.
Anyone considering moving assets beyond reach of bona fide creditors should appreciate that the courts will adopt a wider approach that should discourage such conduct.
An important ruling1 shows that the courts take a broad approach to what may amount to a ‘transaction’ that places an asset out of reach of the victim. Avoiding a debt is tempting but highly risky, particularly where high value assets are at risk, such as real estate and commercial interests.
A majority of the Supreme Court recently held that an insolvent company does not suffer any recoverable loss if payments are made from its bank accounts that discharge a debt owed by that company. This decision adds to the growing case law on the Quincecare duty.
The claim against HSBC