Fulltext Search
District of Delaware attributes value to Debtor’s credit facility in denying a fraudulent transfer claim based on unreasonably small capital despite existing basis for lenders to terminate and subsequent termination of the facility

On September 30, 2014, in In re SemCrude, L.P.,1 the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, held that direct partnership distributions by debtor SemGroup, L.P. (the “Debtor”) and indirect partnership distributions by its general partner, SemGroup G.P., L.L.C., to certain limited and general partners could not be avoided as constructive fraudulent transfers.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Line of credit
Quadrant v. Vertin: duty to maximize value of an insolvent enterprise—business judgment rule applies to interested directors’ “risky” strategy to increase value, even though creditors bear the downside and the controller stands to benefit

In Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. Vertin (October 1, 2014), Vice Chancellor Laster clarified the Delaware Chancery Court’s approach to breach of fiduciary duty derivative actions brought by creditors against the directors of an insolvent corporation.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Business judgement rule, Delaware Court of Chancery
Second Circuit holds that a sale by a chapter 15 debtor in a foreign main proceeding of a claim against an obligor located in the U.S. must be reviewed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code

On September 26, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, overturning decisions by the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court for the Southern District of New York, held that the Bankruptcy Court was required to review under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code the transfer of a claim by a chapter 15 debtor with a recognized foreign main proceeding pending in the British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”).1     In a case under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code in which a foreign main proceeding has been recognized, section 1520(a)(2) of the Bankr

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Make whole premiums and unmatured interest

Judge Drain’s recent decision confirming the Momentive Performance Materials Inc. plan is just the latest in a series of recent cases involving “make whole” premiums. As in several of the recent cases, the lenders lost because the contract did not clearly enough provide for the make whole premium in the event of an acceleration rather than prepayment.

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Interest
S.D.N.Y. Bankruptcy Court denies claim for make-whole premium and allows cram down of debtors’ chapter 11 plan paying secured creditors below-market interest rates on replacement notes

On August 26, 2014, the Honorable Robert D. Drain, Bankruptcy Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, issued several bench rulings (the “Bench Rulings”) in connection with confirmation of a plan of reorganization in the chapter 11 cases of MPM Silicones, LLC, et al.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
Bankruptcy court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine tax refund claim requested by post-confirmation liquidating trustee

A bankruptcy court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine a tax refund claim under Section 505(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code where the refund was requested by a liquidating trustee appointed pursuant to a plan, as opposed to a pre-confirmation bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession, the Second Circuit held in United States v. Bond, Docket No. 12-4803 (2nd Cir. Aug. 13, 2014).

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Debtor, Liquidation, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Fourth Circuit invalidates third-party release provision in chapter 11 plan

On June 27, 2014, in National Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Highbourne Foundation, 1 the United States  Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, agreeing with decisions by the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern  District of Virginia and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which were issued upon  remand from a prior appeal, held that the third-party non-debtor release provision in the chapter 11 plan  of reorganization of National Heritage Foundation, Inc.  was invalid.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, Remand (court procedure), Fourth Circuit, Sixth Circuit
Chapter 11 plan provision allowing individual members of official committee to be reimbursed for professional fees and expenses held invalid, but committee members may be awarded reimbursement for professional fees and expenses incurred in making a

Substantial Contribution to the Case

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Eighth Circuit holds that trademark license included in substantially performed integrated asset purchase transaction is not an executory contract subject to rejection

On June 6, 2014, in Lewis Brothers Bakeries Incorporated and Chicago Baking Company v.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Eighth Circuit
The Supreme Court clarifies the role of bankruptcy courts in Stern v. Marshall-type proceedings, but leaves consent issue for another day

Background

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Tortious interference, United States bankruptcy court