Fulltext Search
California Court Upholds Expansive Definition of Recoupment

The Bottom Line

USA, California, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Medicaid, Ninth Circuit, US District Court for Central District of California
Supreme Court To Hear Dispute Over Debt Recharacterization

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit
Business rescue, restructuring and insolvency the importance of record keeping from both a lending and recovery perspective

Since 1956, legislation has required suretyship agreements to be embodied in a written document. A suretyship agreement involves three parties; simplistically if A does not pay B, then C will. C will step into the shoes of A and perform A’s obligations for them.

South Africa, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Refusing to Fund Into a Bankruptcy: Lessons From Lyondell for Lenders

In the May 2017 issue of Debt Dialogue, we discussed the recent decision by Judge Martin Glenn of the U.S.

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Ruling and the Material Adverse Event Default

In February 2017, Judge Katherine Polk Faila of the Southern District of New York issued a bench ruling1 in Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2017), in which she found that a proposed exchange of senior notes for revolver commitments would violate certain covenants of the issuer’s credit agreement protecting the term loan lenders.

USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, JPMorgan Chase, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Deepening the Divide on Whether Avoidance Provisions Apply to Foreign Transfers

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Fourth Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Business rescue, restructuring and insolvency: reservation of ownership: how protected are you?

The introduction of business rescue proceedings by Chapter 6 of the Companies Act, No 71 of 2008 (Act) created uncertainty on various levels, in particular the extent and nature of certain rights previously enjoyed by creditors.

Our courts are making progress in finding a path through the muddy waters in this regard and every day a judgment is delivered that sheds some light on previous uncertain propositions.

South Africa, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
IRS Can Pursue “Responsible Persons” for Unpaid Trust Fund Taxes and Automatic Stay Cannot Be Used to Enjoin Collection Against Non-Debtor Officers and Directors

The Bottom Line

Puerto Rico, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Eighth Circuit, Third Circuit, First Circuit
Jurisdiction Retention Clause in Sale Order Can’t Provide Bankruptcy Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction for Contract Disputes between Non-Debtors

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, First Circuit
Ninth Circuit Applies Replacement Value in Cramdown Even If Lower Than Liquidation Value

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, US HUD, Ninth Circuit