Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.

Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.

What happened?

Toys R Us' failure was blamed on competition from online retailers, changing consumer spending habits as a result of inflation and increases in business rates.

Nevertheless, competing toy retailer The Entertainer announced sales growth of 6.8% and an increase in pre-tax profits of 37% last week. It does not show signs of succumbing to the pressures that led to the failure of Toys R Us.

How could retailers of similar goods, operating in the same market conditions have had such disparate experiences?