In the recent case of Reynard v Fox, the High Court struck out a claim brought by a litigant in person and cited the recent Supreme Court decision in Barton v Wright Hassall.
The court rejected the claimant's submission that this would be unjust because as a litigant in person, he did not have a detailed knowledge of the insolvency regulations. It ruled that the relevant regulations were not hard to find, difficult to understand or ambiguous.
Background
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Legal Practice, Litigation, TLT LLP, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)