Fulltext Search

On 27 May 2016, South Korea's STX Offshore & Shipbuilding Co. ("STX OS"), once the country's fourth-largest shipbuilding firm by revenue, filed for court-supervised rehabilitation, in the Seoul Central District Court.

Overview

The IMF, in a January 2016 update to its World Economic Outlook, revised its global growth projections for 2016 and 2017 down by 0.2%, citing a decline in emerging markets' growth and lower prices for energy and other commodities.[1]

With the trough in the global economy set to continue, there is unlikely to be any respite for the marine and trade industries, where counterparty insolvency will become more prevalent. 

Key points

  • Principles applying to exercise of liquidators’ powers are the same as those prior to legislative changes
  • Views of creditors influenced by personal considerations to be disregarded
  • The overriding requirement is for liquidators to exercise their professional judgment in the best interests of creditors

The facts

Key Points

  • Test for personal service of bankruptcy petition same as for claim forms
  • Document to be handed to debtor or contents explained and left “with or near” debtor
  • Rule 7.55 can be used to remedy any irregularity in service if necessary

The Facts

Key Points

  • Court considers the impact of the Spanish Insolvency Act on guarantees governed by English law
  • Court holds that the liability under the guarantee was not extinguished

The Facts

Key Points

  • An administrator may be able appeal an order restoring a company following dissolution
  • The court has jurisdiction to backdate a winding up order made following restoration to the date of dissolution
  • The court must exercise its discretion to do so with extreme caution

The Facts

Client Connection Limited (“Company”) was placed into administration and Ms Sharma (“A”) was appointed as administrator. Following a pre-pack sale of the business of the Company, A moved the Company to dissolution.

Key Points

  • Court considers the ownership of assets situated at premises owned by the bankrupt in the context of limited relevant evidence
  • Court emphasises the importance of joining the correct parties to litigation

The Facts

Key points

  • Section 236 (inquiry into company’s dealings) does not have extra-territorial effect
  • Section 237(3) (examination) only has extra-territorial effect where appropriate machinery exists in the foreign jurisdiction
  • Taking of Evidence Regulation not available where litigation not commenced or contemplated

The facts

Key Point

The mere fact that the law of the country in which an asset is situated does not recognise the trust concept does not necessarily invalidate the trust at least as far as English Courts are concerned.

The Facts

Key Points

  • The principle of modified universalism (being the principle underlying the common law power to assist foreign insolvency proceedings) continues to exist
  • There is a common law power to order production of information to assist foreign insolvency proceedings
  • Common law assistance does not enable office holders to do something they would not be able to do under the insolvency laws by which they are appointed

The Facts