This past May, in a highly-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court held in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC that a debtor’s rejection of an executory contract under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code has the same effect as a breach of contract outside of bankruptcy.
USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Mintz, Debtor, Supreme Court of the United States
On April 7, 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its judgment in theRe Indalex Limited case (Indalex).1 The decision addresses the interplay between the deemed trust provision in the Ontario Pension and Benefits Act (PBA)2 and the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA),3 as well as the fiduciary duties of pension plan administrators in CCAA proceedings. Indalex is important for pension plan sponsors and administrators for a number of reasons:
Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Fiduciary, Beneficiary, Liquidation, United Steelworkers, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal for Ontario