In 2002 the Supreme Court of Canada, in Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd, 2002 SCC 7 (Dynex) affirmed that gross overriding royalty interests (GOR) could constitute interest in land provided the parties so intended and that intention was sufficiently evidenced in an agreement.
Canada, Ontario, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
On April 7, 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its judgment in theRe Indalex Limited case (Indalex).1 The decision addresses the interplay between the deemed trust provision in the Ontario Pension and Benefits Act (PBA)2 and the federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA),3 as well as the fiduciary duties of pension plan administrators in CCAA proceedings. Indalex is important for pension plan sponsors and administrators for a number of reasons:
Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Fiduciary, Beneficiary, Liquidation, United Steelworkers, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal for Ontario