Fulltext Search
A business acquisition strategy put to the test in the context of a proposal

Does a claim for a balance of sale of shares, originally owed by one of the two entities that amalgamated to become the debtor, constitute an equity claim pursuant to section 2(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act1 (hereafter the BIA) in the context of a proposal of that same debtor?

If so, what are the consequences for the Seller?

Background

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Une stratégie d’acquisition d’entreprise mise à épreuve dans un contexte de proposition concordataire

Questions en litige

Est ce qu’une créance relative à un solde de prix de vente d’actions, initialement due par une des deux entités ayant fusionné pour devenir la débitrice, constitue une réclamation relative à des capitaux propres au sens de l’article 2 (1) de la Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité1 (ci après la « LFI ») dans le cadre de la proposition de cette même débitrice?

Le cas échéant, quelles sont les conséquences pour le Vendeur?

Trame factuelle

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Use of Bob Richards Rule to Determine Ownership of Tax Refund Within Consolidated Group: Consolidated Return Filers Should Check Their Tax Sharing Agreements Now

On February 25, 2020, in Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, No. 18-1269 (U.S. 2020), the U.S. Supreme Court effectively ruled that the so-called “Bob Richards rule” should not be used to determine which member of a group of corporations filing a consolidated federal income tax return is entitled to a federal income tax refund.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Income tax, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Supreme Court of the United States