Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
The Bottom Line:
USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Illinois
The Bottom Line:
USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Liquidation, Collateralized debt obligation, Bank of New York Mellon, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of New Jersey