Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
Included in this update: Government extends temporary COVID-19 measures in CIGA 2020 and more...
COVID-19
CIGA 2020 extensions in force
WELCOME TO OUR LATEST EDITION OF CORPORATE FINANCE NEWS. READ ON FOR UPDATES RELATING TO COVID-19; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS; CLIMATE CHANGE AND MORE...
COVID-19: LEGAL & REGULATORY CHANGES
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY AND GOVERNANCE ACT 2020 IN FORCE
Included in this update: Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill introduced to Parliament; FRC updates guidance on corporate governance and reporting and more...
Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill introduced to Parliament
Where a company brings a claim against its directors for losses caused by their wrongdoing, the Supreme Court has confirmed the established position that directors cannot escape the claim by arguing that their actions are attributed to the company itself on the basis that the directors were acting as the agents of the company.
Introduction
Introduction