Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court, in Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., Case No. 16-784, ruled that the “securities safe harbor” under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532, does not shield transferees from liability simply because a particular transaction was routed through a financial intermediary—so-called “conduit transactions.”
USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Seventh Circuit
A Jersey company or one of its creditors may wish the company to be placed into administration in England under Schedule B1 of the UK's Insolvency Act 1986 (the "Act").
Jersey, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Bedell Cristin, Debtor, Commercial property, Limited partnership, Liquidation, Commercial mortgage-backed security, Unit trust, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Courts of Jersey
A Jersey company or one of its creditors may wish the company to be placed into administration in England under Schedule B1 of the UK's Insolvency Act 1986 (the "Act").
Jersey, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Bedell Cristin, Debtor, Commercial property, Limited partnership, Liquidation, Commercial mortgage-backed security, Unit trust, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Courts of Jersey