Fulltext Search
How Many Connections are Too Many? Bankruptcy Court Finds Multiple Attenuated Connections Not Enough to Warrant Disqualification of Debtors’ Professional

Introduction

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Will We Have New Rules for Corporate Bankruptcies? Recently Proposed Legislation That Could Reform Chapter 11 Practice

Overview

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, US Congress
No Procedural Notice, No Problem: 11th Circuit Affirms Due Process Not Violated Where Debtor Provides Actual Notice

Overview

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court, Eleventh Circuit
A Check is Transferred When It’s Honored, Not Delivered

Readers familiar with contract law undoubtedly know the “mailbox rule,” that an offer is accepted the moment a document goes in the mail.1 The United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit (the “BAP”) recently dealt with its own variant of the mailbox rule: does the issuance of a check constitute a transfer of estate assets on the date the check is delivered or on the date it is honored?

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
To Cap or Not to Cap: Ninth Circuit Vacates Order of District Court and Revisits Section 502(b)(6)

In this installment of “To Cap or Not to Cap,” which was previously featured on Weil’s Bankruptcy Blog in May of 2015 (see here), we reviewed a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In Kupfer v.

USA, California, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Law Firm Management, Litigation, Real Estate, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, US District Court for Northern District of California
Subjective Intent to Assume Unexpired Lease of Nonresidential Real Property Deemed Insufficient

Pursuant to a provision of the Bankruptcy Code familiar to readers of Weil’s Bankruptcy Blog (see our prior post, To Assume or Not to Assume, that Is the Question: What Act Constitutes “Assumption” Under Section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code?), the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently affirmed a bankruptcy c

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Landlord, Debtor in possession, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
Channel Islands Securities Exchange - Restructuring Update

Hopefully you have received previous updates from us in relation to the Channel Islands Stock Exchange (CISX) and the proposed restructuring of the CISX.

Guernsey scheme of arrangement

I am pleased to confirm that we now have confirmation that the restructure of the CISX by way of a scheme of arrangement was approved by the Royal Court in Guernsey last Friday.

Guernsey, Jersey, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, Ogier, Security (finance), Stock exchange, Guernsey Financial Services Commission
In the matter of Ruscoe Ltd (In Liquidation) [2012]: directors' liability for breach of fiduciary duty

The recent decision of the English High Court in the case of Fry v Sherry [2012] (In the matter of Ruscoe Ltd (In Liquidation)) serves as a timely reminder of the potential personal liabilities faced by directors should they breach their fiduciary duties. 

Summary of the facts

United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Shareholder, Fiduciary, Companies Act 1985 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)