Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. WestLB AG, 961 N.Y.S. 2d 360 (2012)
CASE SNAPSHOT
Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 372 (7th Cir. 2012)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In a matter of first impression in the Seventh Circuit, the court held that a chapter 7 trustee’s rejection of an executory contract did not terminate the trademark license contained therein.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In re Zota Petroleums, LLC, 482 B.R. 154 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In re American Capital Equipment, LLC, 688 F.3d 145 (3d Cir. 2012)
CASE SNAPSHOT
Giuliano v. Shorenstein Company, LLC (In re Sunset Aviation, Inc.), Adv. No. 11- 50965, Bankr. No. 09-10778, 2011 WL 4002429 (Bankr. D. Del. Sept. 7, 2011)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Bankr. Case No. 08-01420 (JMP) (SIPA), 2011 WL 4553015 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2011)
CASE SNAPSHOT
Geltzer v. Mooney (In re MacMenamin’s Grill Ltd.), Adv. Case. No. 09-8266, Bankr. Case No. 08-23660, 2011 WL 1549056 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2011)
CASE SNAPSHOT
Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank New York Branch, f.k.a. Calyon New York Branch v. American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.), No. 09- 4295, 2011 WL 522945 (3d Cir. February 16, 2011)
CASE SNAPSHOT